Tuesday, November 17, 2009

BLOG PARTY!!!

Albert Einstein is going to be featured in his own comic book series! Each month, you'll be able to read his zany adventures as he conquers all the evil minions that try to stand in his way of understanding the secrets of physics! Okay, I made all that up...but it could happen. And if it did, just think about how many more young students might be willing and able to learn about this important figure in science's history.

My inquiry question is, does it matter what students read in school, or is it more important that they are reading at all? To clarify, is there more value placed on reading "classic" novels as opposed to textbooks, or biographical non-fiction, or even comic books/graphic novels? My current conclusion is that while there has been more value placed on textbooks in the past, it is becoming more and more apparent that times are changing and textbooks are being reconsidered as the best reading tools.

1. Reading difficulties often stem from a lack of interest in the material than from a helpless problem. In the Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy from October 2006, Kimberly Lenters looks into the problem of students who are resistant readers early on becoming struggling readers as they grow up. According to Lenters, a student's interest in reading material has a significant impact on his or her struggles with reading for school. Lenters analyzed several studies that were conducted by other experts on the topic of reading habits and issues from children in school. Lenters makes the argument that teachers need to change their ways in regard to assigned reading, for the sake of the students and their ability to grow as readers (Lenters 136-39).

I personally agree with this assessment because I know that when I was in high school, I had an English teacher who had an adverse effect on my reading habits. We were assigned six book reports that year, three each semester. The first report of the year, I decided to write on a book that I was interested in. It was an autobiography on a person that I was a pretty big fan of. I read the book completely and was more interested in what I was learning from the book than anything I'd read in a long time. I wrote my report and turned it in. I actually enjoyed writing the report, which was weird for me. A week or so later, we got our first grades. I got a "B." I was shocked. I had always been an "A" student and this was something that wasn't the slightest bit hard for me to understand and write about. I asked the teacher why I had received that grade and she told me that it was based on my choice of reading material. So for the next five book reports, I selected books that had been made into movies, watched the movies, checked some reviews on the books on Amazon.com, and wrote my reports. I never read a single one of those books. I got an "A" on every single one of those reports. Due to the teacher's reaction to my personal reading interests and the way it adversely affected my grade, I was done with assigned readings for school.

2. Reading comics and graphic novels can demonstrate emotions, situations, and lessons far better than standard text. In class, we've had several assigned readings. While I enjoyed a large number of them, the one I enjoyed the most was the graphic novel by Satrapi. Past readings have had to rely on words to convey the thoughts and feelings of the characters. Colorful descriptions with all sorts of metaphors and comparisons were made. In Satrapi's book, even though it was black and white, I was able to grasp feelings and thoughts so much quicker than in any other reading. In one panel, we can see multiple people's expressions and their reactions to what is happening around them. In text, something like that would take at least a paragraph to explain.

There's an old saying that I'd be willing to bet most of us have heard numerous times. "Actions speak louder than words." Basically, this means that you can say whatever, but to actually see something means more than all the words you could ever say or write. By using graphics to express things instead of words, the possibilities are greatly increased for both the author/artist to convey their story and the reader/student to comprehend it.

3. Teachers have already begun using readings other than texts in classes. Gene Yang is a high school teacher and a cartoonist who has seen great value in using comics in his teachings. He says that the use of comics is beneficial because comics are popular, visual, and can be motivational (Yang). I surveyed a few teachers, some that I have had in classes, and a couple that I haven't. I asked questions regarding reading assignments and the responses were actually pretty similar. Book reports, thankfully, seem to be going the way of the dinosaur. Although, the couple that have used them said they did assign the books to be read. Interestingly, every single teacher I surveyed said that they have started using other forms of literature in their teachings, be it plays, films or comics. It seems that there is an ever-growing understanding that literature can escape the pages of a book and begin to appear in various other forms.

One interesting response comes from our own professor Nancy Knowles, in which she says that there needs to be some sort of a blend between reading for engagement and structured reading assignments for uniform learning. I can see this point quite well, I obviously think students should read things that interest them, but I can understand that in order to guide developing minds, it might be necessary to have some element of control over what they're taking in.

To conclude, I would like to get your responses on the following question: do you think that students should be told what to read, or should they be free to my that choice on their own? And also, do you think there are greater benefits to exploring other forms of literature, or should classrooms continue to be full of copies of Charles Dickens novels and Moby Dick?


WORKS CITED

Lenters, Kimberly. "Resistance, struggle, and the adolescent reader." Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy. 50.2 (2006): 136-46. Print.

Satrapi, Marjane. Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood. 1st ed. Paris, France: Pantheon, 2003. Print.

Yang, Gene. "Comics In Education." Humble Comics.com. 2003. Gene Yang, Web. 2 Nov 2009. .

Freestyle 6

I have been reading another script lately: Neil Simon's "The Odd Couple." I'm directing this play next term and I have auditions at the end of November, so I've been reading it and starting to analyze the various characters so I can best cast the actors. I'm still obviously trying to get caught up with my schoolwork, so it's a little more difficult to focus on the script than I would like, but such is life...and school. I am really excited for the auditions though. I hope I get a good amount of talent to choose from! :)

Scene Response 2

It's interesting to see how similar and different these are. First of all, I find it interesting that Orson Welles and Anthony Hopkins played Othello. The Welles one I can kind of understand, being so long ago, but Hopkins? I believe there were "blackface" laws in place by then and I can only imagine the buzz in Hollywood when that casting announcement came out. I will say that each of these scenes was good, but in different ways. The Orson Welles one did a good job of capturing an older time period, and Welles was powerful yet vulnerable in his performance. Iago in this one seemed a little too honest, he wasn't "pulling the strings" as it were. In the Hopkins version, Othello was much less powerful and came across as more of a charming friend to Iago. Also, it didn't seem like Iago and Othello were doing anything, in their world, I couldn't tell you what action they were involved with during the scene. Iago in this version was much better at being sneaky and manipulative. My favorite version was easily the newest one. Othello was powerful and vulnerable at the same time. He pushed Iago to talk out of a place of power more so than just friendship. Iago was also the best in this version. He played a perfect blend of caring friend with evil intentions. I liked that the director had him literally in Othello's ear by the end of it. The other thing I really liked about this version was that by using cuts and stretching the length of time that the conversation was taking place in, it made it feel more like something Iago was working on all day. Rather than a five minute conversation, this version made it look like Othello had been trying to get the information out of Iago all day long. This added even more to Iago's manipulations because he was patient and waited for the right moments to speak.

Quote Response 9

IAGO: "Ply Desdemona well and you are sure on 't. [Speaking lower] Now, if this suit lay in Bianca's power, how quickly should you speed!"
CASSIO: [laughing] "Alas, poor caitiff!"
OTHELLO: [aside] "Look how he laughs already!" (Shakespeare 1007)


This exchange is when Iago is tricking Cassio into talking about Bianca in front of Othello, who believes them to be talking about Desdemona. This is very important to the story because this is what causes Othello to go bat-shit crazy and kill Desdemona. I picked this particular chunk because it does a good job of showing just how manipulative Iago is by loudly mentioning Desdemona and then quietly shifting to Bianca so Othello remains unaware.

Freestyle 5

Well, "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" is over now. It went really well, actually people have been talking about it as one of the best shows they've seen at EOU in a long time, which makes me feel pretty good. I'm definitely exhausted after last week, but "the show must go on." In this case, the show is my schoolwork, I had to back away from everything last week to be able to have time and energy to perform, so now I have to make up for a week's worth of missed work. That's pretty much what I've been doing since Sunday. Not too much else to talk about.

Quote Response 8

IAGO: "Now, sir, be judge yourself whether I in any just term am affined to love the Moor."
RODERIGO: "I would not follow him then."
IAGO: "O sir, content you. I follow him to serve my turn upon him." (Shakespeare 940)

This exchange happens very early in the play. I chose it because I think it's kinda rare, and therefore interesting, to have a villain reveal his intentions so early in a play. The fact that this conversation is in the play, and happens so early on, really helps set the tone for Iago's character right off the bat. Another reason I chose this is because I would love to get the chance to play Iago sometime.

Quote Response 7

MRS. HALE: "We think the -- cat got it." (Glaspell 846)

This line is delivered to the men investigating the house. I think it's important because of it's obvious meaning and a possible implied meaning. A little before this line, the women are talking about how Mrs. Wright didn't have a cat, and wouldn't have one because she was afraid of them. When Mrs. Hale tells the men that they think the cat got the bird, they are obviously covering up for the fact that the bird's had been murdered, in the same way that Mr. Wright had been. The women believe that Mr. Wright must have killed Mrs. Wright's bird and so she killed him in the same manner. The possible implied meaning could come from the use of the word "cat" to talk about Mrs. Wright. With this meaning, the author would be making it even more clear that the women believe the dead bird serves as motive/evidence to the theory that Mrs. Wright murdered her husband.

Scene Response 1

The back cover of O has a quote from a reviewer calling it the "most controversial movie of the year." I don't know if I'd say that, but I think I can see where some of that comes from. Personally, I liked the movie. I thought it was a good modern day version of Othello, but I did notice that they were REALLY pushing the racism issue as hard as a mom pushing triplets.

The scene I chose for this post was the basketball game against the Bulldogs. The Bulldogs are apparently supposed to be a real tough team and so it's really special and impressive when O leads his team to victory against them. Something I noticed here was that the Bulldogs team was made up of black guys. There might have been one white guy running around somewhere, but this team was definitely featured as a black team. Every other team in the movie was mainly white, or at the very least balanced. Even O's team was all white with the exception of him. The reason I bring this up is because the movie seemed to be continuing the stereotype that black people are predisposed to be better at basketball than white people.

As I was watching the movie, I actually thought that I wished I had to write our last discussion on Blackboard based off this film, instead of the actual play, because they literally loaded it with racial imagery. The soundtrack was very "urban" with most of the songs either focusing on being black or throwing the n-word around like a normal greeting. I'm not offended by this at all, and as an actor/director I completely agree with freedom of speech and expression, especially with art. I just thought it was a little too transparent that they were relying on the race issue to carry a lot of the film. What is weird about that is that the film didn't need it. I thought the acting was pretty good throughout and the story the told was great. Anyhoo, I liked the movie but I was a little surprised at how hard they pushed the extra bits of race stuff.

Friday, November 6, 2009

Freestyle 4

Haven't done a freestyle blog in a while! Not much has changed in my reading habits...I'm still very involved in my script for "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" since our show opens this coming Wednesday, November 11! I hope a lot of people come see it, it should be really good! Tickets can be reserved by calling 962-3757.

I'm also starting to read and re-read the script for the play "The Odd Couple" which I'm directing winter term. I literally will get about 2 weeks between shows before I get super busy with my next one! Ahhhhhhh!

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Quote Response 6

I've chosen a few scattered frames, rather than just a few that are together.

Satrapi starts to get interested in politics and begins to abandon her earlier dreams of being a prophet. She starts to move God lower and lower on her list of priorities and interests. "GOD: So you don't want to be a prophet anymore? SATRAPI: Let's talk about something else. ... GOD: It will be 75 [degrees Faranheit] in the shade. SATRAPI: Shhh! Wait a second!" (Satrapi 13-14). "SATRAPI: Don't you think I look like Che Guevara? Maybe I'll be even better as Fidel Castro! [God leaves the room while Satrapi looks at herself in the mirror.] Where are you? [Satrapi searches her room for God.] Are you there?" (Satrapi 16). [Satrapi lies in bed, crying] "God, where are you?" [The narrative line reads "That night he didn't come."] (Satrapi 17).

This bit interested me because I think it shows great insight on Satrapi's part to realize that she had begun to put other matters in front of God in her life. She does a good job of showing that as a young girl who was overly excited, she wasn't aware that she was somewhat turning her back on God. Of course, she soon becomes aware of his absence and regrets her behavior.